|
|
2023-08-27 17:58:09 ET
i mean, pretty much every other country on the planet large and small has some version of that, so there really isn't any reason it can't be expanded to all US citizens other than the fact that we seem to have a government in the US that is more unduly compromised and corrupted by corporate lobbies than virtually any other country on the planet.
this is also why the US is one of only 2 countries on the planet (new zealand being the other, for some reason) that even allows pharmaceuticals to advertise on TV.
the idea that healthcare should be for-profit and tied to capitalism is basically considered unethical in the rest of the developed world.
san francisco, where i live now, actually does have fully "socialized" healthcare so long as you're basically not making six figures, and it's absolutely better and more versatile than any private health insurance i've had anywhere in my life, or that my family (outside of my brother) has.
but, yeah, i don't really know what the US's problem is in this regard. tricare is clearly a system that works very well. even medicare is vastly more popular amongst consumers than private insurance.
but the insurance industry has clearly bought off enough politicians to keep things like this from just being nationalized for all citizens.
imagine if they tried doing the same privatization shit for, like, policing, or fire fighting. also how are these things functionally different, from a human rights standpoint, from healthcare? it's just ridiculous. |
|